Saturday, July 18, 2009

Pedestrian, Just Pedestrian

I nearly hit a man in a crosswalk today.

I was sitting at a red light, having missed the previous green, a large SUV was to my left, blocking any view that I had in that direction. When the light turned green, I lifted from the clutch, pressed the accelerator and then slammed on the brakes. A blur of white crossed in front of me, running into my view from the far side of the SUV: white boy, white shoes with no laces, white wife beater tee, white cap cocked sideways, white capri pants (yes, capri pants) too large and being held up by one hand. After I worried that I'd actually hit this fine young gentleman, I wondered how he moved so fast while having to hold his pants up. He was trying to run through the intersection against the light. With a great athletic leap, he jumped up and away, his hands landing on my hood--probably not the 'hood that he'd intended on visiting.

He yelled. I pointed at the green street light. He yelled some more and ran on across the street and up the sidewalk. There were people and cars everywhere... was he embarrassed? Was his yelling about saving face after his head had deserted him in front of so many watching eyes?

The near incident stirred me, so much that I crept out into the intersection and looked both ways even though I had a green light. I was headed to the library, but my internal GPS rebooted and I drove straight home out of habit. Oops. When I arrived, it dawned on me...

I wasn't so worried about his bruised ego, I was more worried that I might have knocked a few IQ points out of him, since it was obvious that he didn't have many to spare.

There goes a "special person."

27/52: "The Cluetrain Manifesto" by LLSW

Book 27/52: "The Cluetrain Manifesto" by Levine, Locke, Searls, Weinberger, 3/5 Stars
A relic, having been printed in 2000, but I can definitely see how this book had an impact at the time and has shaped business strategy since. However, for me, it carried a tone that was, at times, lecturing and came off as very scientific. If you've read any of my reviews of late, you'll know that right-brained books that allow the back of my head to wander/wonder get better ratings from me. Yes, it's my review and I'll write what I want to. So, when the Cluetrain is forcing me to get on board and I've no choice over my destination, I kinda have one foot on the train, but one foot swinging from the side in case something more interesting comes along.

"Chat, email, home pages--all reinforce our feeling that not only is it easy to enter into discourse with others, but also that we're by-god entitled to wade into the conversation stream."

And once we enter into it, we better be authentic, pay attention and prepared for anything to happen. Word.

GOAL: 52 books in 52 weeks!

Book #26 = "What Kind of World Do You Want?" by Jim Lord, 5/5 Stars
Book #25 = "The New Rules of Marketing & PR" by David Meerman Scott, 4/5 Stars
Book #24 = "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell, 3/5 Stars
Book #23 = "Lisey's Story" by Stephen King, 1/5 Stars
Book #22 = "My Favorite Place on Earth" by Jerry Camarillo Dunn, 4/5 Stars
Book #21 = "Wisdom 2.0" by Soren Gordhamer, 4/5 Stars
Book #20 = "Oath Of Gold" by Elizabeth Moon, 5/5 Stars
Book #19 = "The Age Of Engage" by Denise Shiffman, 3/5 Stars
Book #18 = "What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20" by Tina Seelig, 4/5 Stars
Book #17 = "Animal Farm" by George Orwell, 4/5 Stars
Book #16 = "Divided Allegiance" by Elizabeth Moon, 3/5 Stars
Book #15 = "The Curious Incident of the Dog..." by Mark Haddon, 2/5 Stars
Book #14 = "The Sheepfarmer's Daughter" by Elizabeth Moon, 3.5/5 Stars
Book #13 = "Love Is The Killer App" by Tim Sanders, 4/5 Stars
Book #12 = "Fight Club" by Chuck Palahniuk, 4.5/5 Stars
Book #11 = "The Time Traveler's Wife" by Audrey Niffenegger, 5/5 Stars
Book #10 = "The Finder" by Colin Harrison, 3.5/5 Stars
Book #9 = "Veronika Decides To Die" by Paulo Coelho, 1/5 Stars
Book #8 = "By The River Piedra I Sat Down & Wept" by Paulo Coelho, 3/5 Stars
Book #7 = "Stiff" by Mary Roach, 2/5 Stars
Book #6 = "Love in the Time of Cholera" by Gabriel Garcia-Marquez, 1/5 Stars
Book #5 = "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy, 3/5 Stars
Book #4 = "Eleven Minutes" by Paulo Coelho, 2/5 Stars
Book #3 = "The Good Guy" by Dean Koontz, 3/5 Stars
Book #2 = "My Ishmael" by Dan Quinn, 2/5 Stars
Book #1 = "The Zahir" by Paulo Coelho, 3.5/5 Stars


READ MORE!

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Speaking of Playing vs. Winning...

Having my own morning full of trial and error, which I don't mind at all. I've been meaning to try out Disqus on my blog ever since I first read about it on Fred Wilson' AVC Blog (an amazing read, btw). What is Disqus, you ask? Well, I'm glad you asked...
Disqus (pronounced "discuss) enhances the comment system on blogs so that they can be threaded. In addition, it also allows me to comprehensively add connect APIs so that you can comment under the guise of your Facebook profile, et al.
Since I've been more actively blogging, I've seen pageviews increase and, likewise, comments. Before we explode in the comment unisphrere I thought it'd be a good idea to try this now, rather than later.

These types of things hit my limit of technical knowledge; I know just enough to get myself in trouble. So, for me, it comprises a learning experience where I seriously hope I don't blow something up. We've been talking about winning and losing... blowing this blog up would be a big LOSS, but I'd learn from it greatly and continue to play the game with my newfound knowledge! I'm not afraid of failure; it's a learning opportunity.

I've been getting many great comments from readers about how much they enjoy reading my posts. I thank you all and invite you to leave a quick comment on THIS post so that I can test whether I like the Disqus platform or not.

So tell me, do you like what the bigBADbobby has to say? (Be nice)

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

My Best Buy Contest Submission

The following job description is my submission to the Best Buy job description contest... nothing to win but for a lil' writing fame.

RESPONSIBILITIES
The Sr Manager, Emerging Media Marketing must be able to, first of all, create an acronym for his or her title because saying the “Sr Manager, Emerging Media Marketing” each time the position is referred to will contradict one of the qualifications below: Efficiently manage one’s time. For the purpose of this job description, we will use “SM,EMM”, it’s up to you whether you wish to recognize the pause dictated by the comma in the title (however, please reread the qualification about time management).

The SM,EMM must be responsible, as this section suggests. Responsibility means being relied upon to make sound decisions on one’s own in accordance with the company message and be accountable for such decisions in the areas of strategy, budget and management. It also means that the employee mustn’t @ reply when the tweet called for the privacy of a DM. In emerging media, it is important to be authentic and accountable or someone will bust you. It is also important to remember that an organization has fewer than four hours to respond to any misleading or improper information posted online (such as videos taken by employees in the back of the store), therefore the SM,EMM must be available 24/7 in case of such emergencies.

This employee is required to understand as much as possible about the brands, products, initiatives and services of the company or, when in doubt, leverage the general public for the correct information since the internet has more information and has proven to be quicker to report it than any other medium.

There are a billion people in the world that can use the tools that the SM,EMM will have to use and there are a many who can tell a story, but few that can do both. The SM,EMM must be a master in the art of persuasive non-fiction through the channels of emerging media. Long gone are the days of epic public relations fables, today’s communications specialist must be eloquently pithy.

The SM,EMM must not only be virtual, but must interact with real people, as well. This position will serve as the liaison between the company and our agency partners. Developing a network to accomplish tasks is a must in this position and the SM,EMM should be an inspirational manager for all direct reports (a box of donuts goes a long way).

Be creative.

BASIC QUALIFICATIONS
Basic qualifications are like the sign at the amusement park, “You must be this tall to ride.”
  • Equally be able to speak and write in proper English, but squeeze a message into as few characters as possible without sacrificing comprehension.
  • Understand the difference between dialogue and monologue; in other words, the difference between conversation and broadcast.
  • Efficiently manage one’s time. We realize that it’s very easy to get sucked into comments on status updates, so avoiding it when it isn’t in accordance with the company mission is a necessity.
  • The internet is the best place to lie—you can be anyone you want online—therefore the SM,EMM must be real and truthful. The “Poke in the Arm” test may be administered at the interview.
  • Be able to work with the following sites/tools: LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Plaxo, Google, Alltop, Backtype, Blogger, Ning, Tweetdeck, Seesmic, Squidoo, Twitter Grader, Friend or Follow, delicious, Slideshare, YouTube, Vimeo, StumbleUpon, Digg, PRWeb, Scribd, Flickr, WordPress, TypePad, Technorati, IceRocket, Tumblr, TipJoy, Alexa, Wikipedia, and BaseCamp (this list may change, in fact will change, with daily frequency).
  • Understand the following acronyms: RSS, SEM, SEO, PPC, CPM, CPC, LOL, IMHO, WTF, API, B2C, B2B, CTR, IM, PV, RON, WWW, TTYL, LMAO, ROTFLMAO, WYSIWYG and, most importantly, RTFM.
  • Own a smartphone (at least one) and have a bountiful data/text plan.
PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS
Preferred qualifications are like paying for the picture that was taken at the end of the roller coaster ride; they’re nice, but not necessary.
  • The Triple Crown of social networking: 1000 Twitter followers, 500 Facebook friends and 250 LinkedIn connections.
  • Finalist in the speed-juggling of tasks across multiple browsers, browser tabs, desktop applications and devices.
  • Nimbly tactile; no fumble-fingers will be hired.
  • Understand and be able to operate under both intended and emergent strategies (be proactive and reactive).
  • Viral, but not contagious.
OTHER
It is a common misnomer that multi-tasking is a desired job requirement. We are looking for someone who realizes that multi-tasking means that nothing is getting your full attention. Therefore, we prefer that the SM,EMM be able to transition between tasks quickly and fluidly without loss of energy or heat.

Being in “the now” is a must in this day and age. Pavlovian responses in meetings to texts, cell phones calls, instant messages, email dings, Skype bloops or calendar alarms will not be looked upon with favor. We recommend the SM,EMM be able to show up to meetings with paper and pen.

Have read the following: Made to Stick, The Tipping Point, Good to Great, Cluetrain Manifesto, New Rules of Marketing & PR, Groundswell, Tribes, Here Comes Everybody, Naked Conversations, Freakanomics, and Wisdom 2.0 (applicant will be asked to provide a book report for each).

Please vote for my job description NOW! The contest has ended, but feel free to visit the Best Buy IdeaX web site.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Is it about playing or winning?

I spent some much-needed time with family this past weekend; kid time is always good time... well, once you figure out how to get them to stop fighting over you.

My nephew is playing baseball this summer and his team has been doing very well. I'd planned to see him play on Friday night, but the other team didn't have enough players and had to forfeit. It dawned on me to ask, "Would you rather play and potentially lose or not play and win by forfeit?"

"Win by forfeit," he said.

"But you don't get to play," I clarified.

"But we win, right?" he replied.

He was right, they do win and I was right, they don't get to play. I remember when my Grandpa used to tell me about packing a sack lunch in the morning and walking to the baseball field. If two guys were there, then they'd play hot box. With three guys they could play Over the Line and, with more guys, they'd eventually be able to field full teams and play ball until they had to scamper home before dark.

PLAY ball, not WIN ball.

Why has our culture, maybe even the world, placed so much emphasis on the competition and not the activity? My phone is better than yours. My musical tastes are so much more interesting than yours. My life is better than yours. My car is cooler than yours. All of this points to some objective panel out there that determines what really matters in the world, when we all know that no such panel exists. Comparing phones or musical interests has nothing to do with some objective evaluation, your phone works for you and my phone works for me.

End of story.

In competition there are always winners and losers. If we make everything in life about a competition, then we'll always have winners and losers. Someone will win in a relationship and someone will lose. Someone will be a loser. Do you really want to spend all of your time in a relationship trying to beat your partner? No, I don't either. We have to accept that we will have differences between us and it doesn't make one trait better than the other.

I want to feel lucky that I've found love, not that I've won it be knocking over some milk bottles at a carnival. I want to be in a relationship where we work out problems together, not compete to see who can figure out the answer first. Or worse, play the "he said, she said" game everyday because we aren't able to communicate in the first place and someone needs to win.

I don't want to live in a world where I feel lucky that I won by forfeit; I want to feel lucky that had the opportunity to play.

What about you?